Comments on: Williams et. al. v. Walmart

By: The Unrepentant Individual » Carnival of Liberty #1!

The Unrepentant Individual » Carnival of Liberty #1! — Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:14:31 +0000

[...]
Carnival of Liberty #1! Click it or Ticket Egg on face Williams et. al. v. Walmart Google Ear [...]

By: jomama

jomama — Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:36:09 +0000

But it posted as written.

By: jomama

jomama — Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:34:34 +0000

Exercising eminent domain for anyone sucks,
but how is a job equated with slavery?

Is the hotel a jail cell that they’re marched
to every night? Do they wear ball and chain?

If I want to sign an agreement, I’ll sign
an agreement if the agreement meets my taste.

If it’s violated I’ll walk. Hell, I walked
years ago from the non-existent ’social contract’ that a few Amerikums keep mumbling
about.

Now that last paragraph in that post was
mighty interesting.

BTW, comment preview doesn’t look like what
I have in the box where I wrote it. It adds
unwritten line spaces.

By: Brad Warbiany

Brad Warbiany — Sun, 03 Jul 2005 01:53:07 +0000

Good question, KJ. Two reasons.

1) I haven’t followed the Supreme Court that closely, so I added it in because I know a little bit about it.

2) Because it was a favor to big business, as well as a further expansion of federal rules superceding those of the states. Whether it was the judicially correct decision didn’t enter into my use of it as precedent.

By: Lucy Stern

Lucy Stern — Sat, 02 Jul 2005 20:18:52 +0000

Brad, You have a wild imagination. Poor WalMart is always being made the example.

By: KJ

KJ — Sat, 02 Jul 2005 16:31:01 +0000

Curious. Why cite the wine import case? That case increased economic freedom.

By: KJ

KJ — Sat, 02 Jul 2005 16:28:39 +0000

Another example of the blogs beating the LameStream Media to the story.

Very funny.