<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Run, Newt, Run!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unrepentantindividual.com/2006/05/14/run-newt-run/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unrepentantindividual.com/2006/05/14/run-newt-run/</link>
	<description>...the only me I know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:38:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://unrepentantindividual.com/2006/05/14/run-newt-run/comment-page-1/#comment-4404</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 23:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrepentantindividual.com/2006/05/14/run-newt-run/#comment-4404</guid>
		<description>KJ,

I admire Guliani for the way he led NYC after 9/11 and for the way that he cleaned up New York, but I don&#039;t think I&#039;d want to see him as President. I have doubts about his committment to small government as well as his belief in fiscal restraint. That said, he&#039;d made a great Attorney General. 

As for Newt&#039;s marriage troubles, I honestly don&#039;t think they would matter in 2008. That was an issue in the late 90&#039;s when he stepped aside as Speaker, I don&#039;t see it being an issue today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KJ,</p>
<p>I admire Guliani for the way he led NYC after 9/11 and for the way that he cleaned up New York, but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d want to see him as President. I have doubts about his committment to small government as well as his belief in fiscal restraint. That said, he&#8217;d made a great Attorney General. </p>
<p>As for Newt&#8217;s marriage troubles, I honestly don&#8217;t think they would matter in 2008. That was an issue in the late 90&#8217;s when he stepped aside as Speaker, I don&#8217;t see it being an issue today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://unrepentantindividual.com/2006/05/14/run-newt-run/comment-page-1/#comment-4401</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 19:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrepentantindividual.com/2006/05/14/run-newt-run/#comment-4401</guid>
		<description>I like Guiliani the most, but I like Newt, too.  Too bad neither of them can avoid dissing their spouses in much the same fashion at Clinton.  I used to not care about such things, but that issue was such a clue to Clinton&#039;s true character, that I&#039;m not sure I can avoid it anymore.  But I still like their ability to explain ideas, and ideas I like, and trust them on foreign policy.  Which is the most important job of the President nowadays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Guiliani the most, but I like Newt, too.  Too bad neither of them can avoid dissing their spouses in much the same fashion at Clinton.  I used to not care about such things, but that issue was such a clue to Clinton&#8217;s true character, that I&#8217;m not sure I can avoid it anymore.  But I still like their ability to explain ideas, and ideas I like, and trust them on foreign policy.  Which is the most important job of the President nowadays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://unrepentantindividual.com/2006/05/14/run-newt-run/comment-page-1/#comment-4400</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 14:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrepentantindividual.com/2006/05/14/run-newt-run/#comment-4400</guid>
		<description>Perhaps you&#039;re right.  They&#039;d rather have their &quot;maverick&quot; McCain, a beltway insider so inside the system that he&#039;s willing to destroy free speech to make sure he never has to leave...

I have to think, though, that with the external disgust with the Republican party, it doesn&#039;t really matter what the powers-that-be think.  Primary voters are very conservative, and most love Newt.  An early groundswell of support could really get some attention.  The powers-that-be might not like him, but I&#039;m sure they&#039;ve never been accused of not riding coattails from time to time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you&#8217;re right.  They&#8217;d rather have their &#8220;maverick&#8221; McCain, a beltway insider so inside the system that he&#8217;s willing to destroy free speech to make sure he never has to leave&#8230;</p>
<p>I have to think, though, that with the external disgust with the Republican party, it doesn&#8217;t really matter what the powers-that-be think.  Primary voters are very conservative, and most love Newt.  An early groundswell of support could really get some attention.  The powers-that-be might not like him, but I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ve never been accused of not riding coattails from time to time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://unrepentantindividual.com/2006/05/14/run-newt-run/comment-page-1/#comment-4399</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 13:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrepentantindividual.com/2006/05/14/run-newt-run/#comment-4399</guid>
		<description>Brad, 

I saw Newt on Meet the Press yesterday and couldn&#039;t agree more. Unfortunately, he&#039;s as much of a maverick now as he was before the 1994 elections and I&#039;m afraid that the powers-that-be in the GOP want nothing to do with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad, </p>
<p>I saw Newt on Meet the Press yesterday and couldn&#8217;t agree more. Unfortunately, he&#8217;s as much of a maverick now as he was before the 1994 elections and I&#8217;m afraid that the powers-that-be in the GOP want nothing to do with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

